A new kind of Pre-Nup ~CQW

posted by: Vixen

cqw_button-200px-2.jpg
(click the button for more info, email me if you have any great ideas for a topic, I’d love to hear from you!)

http://advice.lovedetour.com/wp-content/uploads/Prenuptial-Agreement.jpg

I recently heard of a new type of pre-nuptial contract, a non-monetary one.  Something called a ‘sex contract’.  There are variances to it but the general idea behind it is the wife-to-be agrees to be open for anything her husband wants to do (sexually) at any and all times.  In return, the husband-to-be promises to not look at porn- unless it’s with his wife or she picks it out, he won’t go to strip clubs- unless approved by his wife, and the most obvious- he can’t cheat.  Theoretically- by the wife agreeing to be his fantasy woman, he won’t have to go to outside sources.

Ummm….hmm….  There is a lot of criticism about this being controlling and unreasonable.  I’ve heard the subject of insecurity come up regarding this topic.  I know of some people who have a ‘contract’ of sorts and it does work for them.  I guess that is what is most important.  But in my mind, besides seeming controlling, most of all to me it seems unrealistic.  Sure, as a giddy soon to be married bride, it seems like something easy to agree to.  And as the groom, who wants to make his wife happy and is about to be consumed in ‘marital bliss’….it seems like something easy to agree to.  But, it raises concern for me long term.  I’m not a fan of signing contracts involving relationships.  What happened to agreeing to things and talking about them as they came up? 

Thoughts?

*****

Happy HUMP Day!!!

~ xo

Vixen

17 Responses to “A new kind of Pre-Nup ~CQW”

  1.   PetalNo Gravatar Says:

    It does beg the question….what about him being open to everything SHE may want? mmmm? cant see too many men signing up to that one lol

  2.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    Petal- I can’t even fathom *asking*….lol.

  3.   PCNo Gravatar Says:

    Controlling? In which way?

    I could do this one. I PROMISE not to look at any porn, except with you– and not even then. I can definitely promise not to cheat too and I won’t go to any strip clubs unless it’s OK with you.

    Now, there are couple of things I’d like you to try… A LOT…

    Doesn’t this sound like a good thing for us Babe? Com’ on. We can make it work ;)

    I LOVE YOU!!!

  4.   JimNo Gravatar Says:

    Assuming that a marriage is a bit of a contractual agreement itself, I don’t see why this one would guarantee any better (or worse) results. If someone just doesn’t want you anymore, physically, after some period of time together, the real question is whether you scrap the whole thing or try to focus on other stuff and move on.

    XO

  5.   KennyNo Gravatar Says:

    If relationships, people, and sexual proclivities never ever changed throughout a relationship this would be perfect. The reality is things change..desire waxes and wanes, body’s change, life gets in the way. This is more of people trying to put things in a box that don’t belong there…doomed to failure…

  6.   JeffNo Gravatar Says:

    Yeah, I think this one is doomed to failure from the start. It’s just in our nature to get bored after a while and want something different. Now, I’m not saying we should act on that but to deny someone porn or strip clubs or to say that you can be everything for someone that he/she may ever want to be is just deluding yourself.

    If I had to do it all over again, I would get my wife to sign a contract that neither of us would be exclusive with each other, that we would be free to partake of porn, strip clubs, prostitutes, whatever as long as it was done safely, and that above all we would always be open and honest with each other.

    Of course that is pretty much what we have now so maybe no contract is required.

  7.   Professor FateNo Gravatar Says:

    And what is the “penalty” for breaching this contract? Is it a divorce? Is it a trip to the mall? Season tickets?

    This sound like an idea for the young and naive. Sex (or lack thereof) and porn are not the cause of marriage failures. They are symptoms of a lack of trust (which this pre-nup codifies).

    Instead of forbidding your man to look at porn, why not talk about hwy you don’t want him to look at at. Instead of requiring the woman that you love to be open to any sexual act you can imagine, why not discuss what you’d like to do. She may not be up for anal sex, but she may be willing to trade penetration of her ass for penetration of his.

    Marriage is about learning what is really important to you and learning what you are willing to give up. An unenforceable piece of paper isn’t going to change that.

  8.   MinorityReportNo Gravatar Says:

    This just seems unrealistic to me, and it *really* wouldn’t work in my situation. I agree with the folks who say it’s “doomed to fail”, and I totally second what Petal said, “what about him being open to everything SHE may want?”

  9.   nitebyrdNo Gravatar Says:

    Something like this is only going to work when we are marrying “replicants”. The majority of human beings will continue to change and evolve over time. Having a sex contract is ridiculous.

  10.   autumnNo Gravatar Says:

    in EVERY relationship i’ve been in, it started with mmmm yeah, i want to make love to you every day baby. all i wanna do is come home to you and do this always…pffftt! sooooo fucking short lived. really. it’s unrealistic. *you do understand that it’s ME in this case that wants all the lovin…bwahahaha*

    a friend once said that marriage should be renewable every 5 years like a driver’s licence, only you’d have to decide what it’s worth at the end of each term. i dunno, it seems kind of odd to me to actually make contracts for relationships. they are ever evolving and need to be free to “Be” in my opinion.

    just barging my way back in here. i’ve missed you soooo much!

    xoxo
    loves autumn

  11.   SageNo Gravatar Says:

    Any contract will work provided both parties enter into it honestly and have integrity. I am a supporter of a contract, not THIS kind of contract but a contract.

  12.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    PC- yes, YOU could do this. You are the exception to most ‘guy rules’.

    I think the novelty of *HAVING* to do something though is going to wear off at some point. ;)

  13.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    Jim- I agree. Which is my issue with contracts in general.

    Ken- I’m totally with you, and I like your analogy of trying to ‘fit it into a box’. Stop trying to do that! LOL

  14.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    Jeff- *LOL* I just don’t understand the purpose of having a ‘contact’. How about you just agree on something and try to stick with that until it doesn’t work and then maybe…IDK, talk about it some more. Novel idea.

    So I’m with you.

  15.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    jr- yes.

    Prof Fate- you bring up a good point. The most valid point. What is the ‘penalty’???? Bc what is a contract w/o some sort of penalty. Which to me just makes this whole thing seem very silly.

    This:
    Marriage is about learning what is really important to you and learning what you are willing to give up. An unenforceable piece of paper isn’t going to change that.

    Exactly.

  16.   VixenNo Gravatar Says:

    Autumn, I completely agree. Which is what makes this contract unrealistic. Sure it’s something you can agree to when you are all happy and blissful-like. But what happens as time goes on. And needs, wants, etc change???

    Sage- I know you are a supporter of contracts. I’m aware of the one you have with your wife. This particular one just seems….unrealistic, insecure and controlling.

  17.   danielleNo Gravatar Says:

    I am out! Just saying! :)

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting