
(click for more info, email me if you have ideas or topics!)
Shay at The S Spot covered an interesting subject in a post “Blow, Blew, Blowing” that I wanted to bring up here.
She had a friend who felt it isn’t really a “BJ” if he doesn’t cum at the end…. “because it’s just not the same act anymore”. She questioned if you could still call it ’sex’ if there’s penetration but nobody orgasms? Her friend wasn’t sure.
So what do you think? Is a BJ still a BJ if it’s incomplete? Does it need a new term?
Is a hand job still a handjob if no one cums- or is it just feeling someone up? Is masturbation still masturbation, or is it just playing with yourself? Is sex still sex if no one cums????
In my opinion? ABSOLUTELY. I believe the names of those acts are exactly that….of the ACT. I don’t think there is anything in a BJ or a handjob or fingering/banging or sex that implies the person has to cum in order for it to be called those things. Sure, the pleasure (often) in giving or receiving one of these IS the O/cumming. But, truth be told, that’s not always the case. AND can be actually known as HEY, foreplay. (~wink~)
A point in case might be to also say- if the sex isn’t enjoyable, is it still sex??? I’m pretty sure those many women out there who have gone through life with out ever experiencing an O will still say they have had sex. I think the actual ‘act’ of having the big O and cumming IS it’s own identity.
Imagine this- “Did you cum?” can be asked at the end of a BJ/sex/handjob.
Now how about this- “Did you BJ?”, “Did you have sex” (how weird does *THAT* sound?! LOL)
So? What do you think?
HappyHUMPday!!!!
~xo



































































